One of the themes of this blog has been the interaction
between fiction and life – what I have from time to time
referred to as the dotted line between fiction and non-fiction.
Rather than attempt to address this issue in an essay, I’ve been posting some hopefully interesting and
illuminating examples. Readers can make of them what they
wish.
In that vein, here are a couple of stories from the July
14, 2015, “New York Times” that attracted my attention. These artistic
endeavors don’t involve writing, but the principle is arguably the same.
The first story reported that Tania Bruguera, a New York-based Cuban artist, had been chosen to be the first
artist-in-residence for Mayor Bill de Blasio’s Office of Immigrant Affairs – a year-long
appointment. At the same time, the NYT said, the Museum of Modern Art announced
that it had acquired a “politically charged” video Ms Bruguera had created
called “Untitled (Havana 2000).”
What interested me about these developments was that Ms
Bruguera was described as an artist “whose work blurs and sometimes obliterates
the line between socially conscious performance art and straight-ahead social
work.”
When the NYT story was published, Ms Brugura was in Cuba
and uncertain when she might leave due to a dispute with the Cuban government
over whether she will be free to return to that country if she departs with a passport that was recently returned to her. But she is hoping that the recent
improvement in U.S.-Cuban relations will allow her to take up the NYC residency
where she believes a melding of the artistic and the civic is “rife with
possibility.”
Art, which is arguably akin to fiction, can interact with
real life is by showing people how to imagine their identity in creative ways,
the artist believes, arguing that this is particularly important for immigrants
who, as a result of their dislocation, may have lost their ability to dream.
Artist residencies can bring new kinds of thinking to city
programs, NYC cultural affairs commissioner Tom Finkelpearl told the NYT,
adding “Tania is obviously at the forefront of this kind of art.”
The other NYT story reported that Joe Gibbons, a filmmaker
and performance artist who once taught art at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology (MIT), had been sentenced to a year in prison for robbing a bank –
an event he filmed with a pocket-sized pink and silver video camera. It was
also apparently captured by bank video cameras.
Mr. Gibbons “claimed it was an act of performance art
coupled with dire financial straits,” the NYT said. The paper also noted that
Gibbons’ MIT profile “cites his predilection
for exploring the boundaries between fact and fiction.”
Gibbons is not a marginal figure. “His work, mainly film
installations, has appeared four times in the Whitney Biennial and is in the
collections of the Museum of Modern Art and the Centre Pompidou in Paris,” the
newspaper said.
“While acknowledging that Mr. Gibbons had dubious legal standing,
Ann Pellegrini, a professor of performance at New York University, called the
case a classic example of ‘performance becoming performative,’ an act that
questions ‘the relationship between actor, audience, and enactment,” the NYT
article said. “In the robbery, the bank teller and the
police unwittingly played their roles ‘without knowing that they were at the
same time performing in Gibbon’s art performance of a bank robbery,’” Pellegrini explained to The Times.
The newspaper article went on to quote art critic Ed
Halter as saying that the robbery might only be part of a larger, future
work. “His [Gibbons’] work has always
incorporated diary elements, and very often in a way that the viewer can’t
quite be certain about what’s true and what’s not.”
Perhaps the bank surveillance video of the Gibbons
robbery will also eventually make it onto the art market, or be acquired
by a major museum.